Category Archives: 3. POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY

THIS IS A DESCENDING CHRONOLOGICAL LIST, FROM 2021 BACKWARDS. REASON: ALL POSITIONS ARE HISTORICAL, AND THEY ARE BEST UNDERSTOOD IN CONNEXION WITH ITS MOMENT. LATER ENTRIES MAY MODIFY EARLIER POSITIONS.

ROMANCE STUDIES IN GERMANY AND WERNER KRAUSS (2002, 7,300 words)

The relations of Romance Studies and Nazism are discussed on the basis of new publications. The second part discusses the career of Werner Krauss, an unjustly neglected scholar.

Posted in 3. POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 6. NARRATIVE THEORY | Leave a comment

ACCESS TO AN IDENTIFICATION OF “TERRORISM”: WORDS AND ACTIONS (2002, 7380 words)

2002, Rethinking Marxism

Posted in 3. POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY | Leave a comment

CAPITALISM MEANS/NEEDS WAR (1998-2001)

Posted in 3. POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

BESINNUNG; AND WHAT MAY THE CENTURY AMOUNT TO: ON OR ABOUT OR BECAUSE OF MARC ANGENOT AS GOAD AND STIMULUS (2000, 10,450 words)

Posted in 3. POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY | Leave a comment

WHAT MAY THE TWENTIETH CENTURY AMOUNT TO: INITIAL THESES (1999-2000, 5,225 words)

Posted in 3. POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY | Leave a comment

WHAT REMAINS OF ZAMYATIN’S WE AFTER THE CHANGE OF LEVIATHANS? OR, MUST COLLECTIVISM BE AGAINST PEOPLE? (1999-2000, 14,030 words)

Posted in 1. SF & UTOPIANISM, 3. POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY | Leave a comment

THE DOLDRUMS: EIGHT NASTY POEMS OF 1989-99 (1,730 words)

Posted in 1. SF & UTOPIANISM, 3. POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY | Leave a comment

ON COGNITION AS ART AND POLITICS: REFLECTIONS FOR A TOOLKIT (1997-99, 16,200 words)

Posted in 1. SF & UTOPIANISM, 3. POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY | Leave a comment

UTOPIANISM FROM ORIENTATION TO AGENCY:  WHAT ARE WE INTELLECTUALS UNDER POST-FORDISM TO DO?  (1997-98, 17,395 words)

Posted in 1. SF & UTOPIANISM, 3. POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY | Leave a comment

ON THE EPISTEMOLOGY AND PRAGMATICS OF INTERCULTURAL THEATRE STUDIES: WITH BROOK’S “MAHABHARATA” AS NEGATIVE EXEMPLUM (1997-98, 11,640 words)

1. Syntactic Considerations; 2. Epistemic Considerations: Monadic Truth vs. Caressing; 3. Interculturalism I: The Mythical Estrangement of Brook’s “Mahabharata” exemplum; 4. Interculturalism II: Critical Estrangement, the Body

Posted in 2. BRECHT-DRAMA-THEATRE, 3. POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY | Leave a comment